Abstract
Periprosthetic femoral fractures are a challenging problem to manage. In the literature various constructs have been designed and tested, most requiring cables for proximal fixation. The Synthes Locking Attachment Plate (LAP) has been designed to achieve proximal fixation without the use of cables.
The aim of this study was to biomechanically evaluate the LAP construct in comparison to a Cable plate construct, for the fixation of periprosthetic femoral fractures after cemented total hip arthroplasty (THA).
Twelve synthetic femora were tested in axial compression, lateral bending and torsion to determine initial stiffness, and stiffness following fixation of a simulated midshaft fracture with and without a bone gap. Two different fracture fixation constructs (six per group) were assessed. Each construct incorporated a broad curved LCP with bi-cortical locking screws for distal fixation. In the Cable construct, 2 cables and 2 uni-cortical locking screws were used for proximal fixation. In the LAP construct, the cables were replaced by a LAP with 4 bicortical locking screws. Axial, lateral bending and torsional stiffness were assessed using intact specimen values as a baseline. Axial load to failure was also measured. The LAP construct was significantly stiffer than the cable construct under axial load with a bone gap (simulating a comminuted fracture) (p=0.01). There were no significant differences between the two constructs in any of the other modalities tested. Loading to failure resulted in no significant differences between constructs, in either initial stiffness or peak load.
In conclusion the LAP construct enables bi-cortical screw fixation around a prosthesis. Compared to cables, this was stiffer when there was a bone gap and thus should offer improved proximal fixation of Vancouver B1 proximal femoral fractures in cemented THA.
