Abstract
Introduction:
Successful total joint arthroplasty requires accruate and reproducible acetabular component position. Acetabular component malposition has been associated with complications inlcuding dislocation, implant loosening, and increased wear. Recent literature had demonstrated that high-volume fellowship trained arthroplasty surgeons are in the “safe zone” for cup inclination and anteversion only 47% of the time. (1) Computer navigation has improved accuracy and reproducibility but remains expensive and cumbersome to many hospital and physicians. Patient specific instrumentation (PSI) has been shown to be effective and efficient in total knee replacements. The purpose of this study was to determine in a cadaveric model the anteversion and inclination accuracy of acetabular guides compared to a pre-operitive plan.
Methods:
8 fresh-frozen cadaveric pelvis specimens underwent Computer Tomography (CT) in order to create a 3D reconstruction of the acetabulum. Based on these 3D reconstruction, a pre-operative plan was made positioning the patient specific acetabulum guides at 40 degrees of inclination and 20 degrees of anteversion in the pelvis.(Figure 1) The guides were created based on the specific bony morphology of the acetabular notch and rim. The guides were created using a 3D printer which allowed for precise recreation of the virtual model. 7 cadaveric specimens underwent creation and implantation of a acetabular guide specific to each specimens bony morphology. Ligamentum, pulvinar, and labum were removed for each cadaver prior to implantation to prevent soft tissue obstruction. The guides were inserted into the acetabular notch with the final position based on the fit of the guide in the notch. (Figure 2) Post-implantation CT was then performed and inclination and anteversion of the implanted guide measured and compared to the preoperative plan.
Results:
In 7 cadaveric specimens post-implantation CT scans were performed and anteversion and inclindation of each guide was calculated and compared to pre-operative plan of 20 degrees anteversion and 40 degrees of inclincation. On average, anteversion in the 7 cadavers measured 20.9 degrees with a standard deviation of 1.8 degrees. Inclincation measured 37.8 degrees with a standard deviation of 3.5 degrees. (Figure 3)
Discussion and Conclusion:
This study demonstrates a proof of concept that patient specific acetabular guides based on pre-operative CT scans and implanted in the human pelvis accurately reproduce the preoperative plan. Guide position was 20.9 degrees of anteversion and 37.8 degrees of inclination with a SD of 1.8 and 3.5 degrees respectively. Soft tissue obstruction may result in increased error in some specimens. This study demonstrates that patient specific models can be made and implanted based on notch fit geometry. Further study is currently underway to using a instrument based on the angle of the cup face is order to guide final cup implanation.
