Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

General Orthopaedics

The Viscoelastic LP-ESP Lumbar Disc Prosthesis With 6 Degrees of Freedom: A Prospective Study of 120 Patients With Two Years' Minimum Follow-Up

International Society for Technology in Arthroplasty (ISTA)



Abstract

Introduction

The viscoelastic lumbar disk prosthesis ESP is an innovative one-piece deformable but cohesive interbody spacer; it provides 6 full degrees of freedom about the 3 axes including shock absorption. The prosthesis geometry allows limited rotation and translation with resistance to motion (elastic return property) aimed at avoiding overload of the posterior facets. The rotation center can vary freely during motion. It thus differs substantially from current prostheses. This study reports the results of a prospective series of 120 patients who are representative of the current use of the ESP implant since 2006.

Material and methods

The surgeries were performed by 2 senior surgeons. There were 73 women and 47 men in this group. The average age was 42 (27–60). The average body mass index was 24.2 kg/m2 (18–33). The implantation was single level in 89% of cases. 134 ESP prostheses were analyzed.

Clinical data and X-rays were collected at the preoperative time and at 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months post-op.

The functional results were measured using VAS, GHQ 28, ODI, SF-36, (physical component PCS and mental component MCS. The analysis was performed by a single observer who was independent from the selection of patients and from the surgical procedure.

Results

The mean operative time was 92 min (SD: 49 min). The mean blood loss was 73 cc (SD: 162 cc). We did not observe device-related specific complications.

All clinical outcomes significantly improved at every time points when compared to the pre-operative status (table 1). In the series, 89% of patients had a good or excellent result at 3 months, 88% at 6 and 12 months, and 93% at 24 months.

Conclusion

The concept of the ESP prosthesis is different from that of the articulated devices currently used in the lumbar spine. This study reports encouraging clinical results about pain, function, kinematic behavior and radiological sagittal balance. The results are in accordance with previous data collected since the first cases performed in 2005.


*Email: