Abstract
Functional joint stability and accurate component alignment are crucial for a successful clinical outcome after TKA. However, there are few methods to evaluate joint stability during TKA surgery. Activities of daily living often cause mechanical load to the knee joint not only in full extension but also in mid-flexion. Computer navigation systems are useful for intra-operative monitoring of joint positioning and movements. The purpose of this study was to compare the varus-valgus stability between knees treated with cruciate-retaining (CR) and posterior-stabilized (PS) TKA at different angles in the range of motion (ROM) especially in mid-flexion, using the navigation technique.
Thirty two knees that underwent TKA with computer navigation technology (precisionN Knee Navigation Software version 4.0, Stryker, Kalamazoo, MI) were evaluated (CR:16; PS:16). The investigator gently applied physiologically allowable maximal manual varus-valgus stress to the knee without angular acceleration, while moving the leg from full extension to flexion, and the mechanical femoral-tibial angle was measured automatically by the navigation system at every 10 degrees throughout the ROM. This measurement cycle was repeated for 3 to 4 times, and maximal varus-valgus laxity was determined as the sum of varus and valgus stress angles for each of the predetermined knee flexion angles. The results of the navigated measurements were used to evaluate varus-valgus instability throughout the ROM and the differences in varus-valgus laxity between pre-TKA (Prior to bone cutting, after navigation registration and suturing of the joint capsule) and post-TKA(After confirming that the TKA components and inserts were firmly placed in an appropriate position, the surgical incision was completely closed). The differences in varus-valgus laxity between the CR and PS groups were compared using the Student's t-test.
The knees examined showed the greatest preoperative laxity at 20 to 40 degrees of flexion, with no statistically significant difference between the CR and PS groups (See Figure 1). However, postoperative assessment revealed that PS knees had more varus-valgus laxity than CR knees at all ROM angles examined, and the differences were statistically significant in the flexion range of 10 to 70 degrees (See Figure.2). The differences between preoperative and postoperative joint laxity were analyzed separately for the CR and PS groups. After CR-TKA, joint laxity decreased across all degrees of knee flexion. The differences between preoperative and postoperative joint laxity were statistically significant for the flexion range of 110 to 120 degrees (See Figure.3). On the other hand, knees treated with PS-TKA showed an increase in joint laxity for the flexion range of 10 to 90 degrees. The differences between the preoperative and postoperative values were statistically significant for the flexion range of 10 to 20 degrees in PS-TKA (See Figure.4).
We successfully evaluated varus-valgus laxity in this study using a navigation system. The results showed that PS knees had greater varus-valgus laxity than CR knees throughout the ROM, and the differences were statistically significant for the flexion range of 10 to 70 degrees. Altogether, we conclude that PS knees have more mid-flexion laxity than CR knees.
