Abstract
Purpose
Management of early onset scoliosis (EOS) can be very challenging. Surgery is indicated when orthotics and casting fail. Growing rod instrumentation has become an effective approach in controlling the deformity while allowing spinal growth. However, as with any surgery, there are known complications including failure of the proximal foundation. We analyzed our patients who underwent growing rod instrumentation and identified factors that were correlated with proximal foundation failure.
Method
Our Pediatric Orthopaedic Spine Database (1992–2010) was reviewed for all patients who underwent growing rod instrumentation. Sixty-six patients with EOS were identified and divided into two groups: Group 1 – proximal foundation failure; and Group 2 – no incidents of proximal failure. The two groups were evaluated for differences in age, sex, weight, upper vertebral level in construct, presence of apical fusion, and pre-operative curve magnitude.
Results
Eight of the 66 patients (12%) had proximal foundation failure. When comparing Group 1 and Group 2, only age, pre-operative kyphosis, and presence of apical fusion were significant differences between the two groups. The mean age of Group 1 patients was 4.9 years (range, 2.6 to 9.2 years) and the mean age of Group 2 patients was 7.5 years (range, 2.4 to 11.6 years) (p <0.006). The mean pre-operative kyphosis in Group 1 was 71 degrees compared to 50 degrees in Group 2 (p=0.049). Among the 12 patients with apical fusion, four (33%) had proximal failure. The presence of apical fusion was also a significant difference between the groups (p=0.003). Linear regression demonstrated a significant correlation between kyphosis and failure (k=0.005, p-value 0.016) as well as age and pullout (k=−0.005, p-value <0.01).
Conclusion
Our data indicates that younger patients with increased pre-operative kyphosis are at a higher risk for proximal failure of their growing rods resulting in increased incidence of unplanned surgeries. The presence of an apical fusion was also correlated to increased failure rates possibly due to stress at the proximal construct. Further research is needed to determine if stronger constructs decrease the pullout rate in the at-risk patients.
