Abstract
AIMS
Pure tibial plafond traumatic pathology (excluding trimalleolar fractures) is rare but troublesome, considering the surgical challenges and the long term disability perspective. Treatment involves a wide variety of implants and techniques, and the procedures choice and timing is highly dictated by the soft tissue damage. We designed this study to assess the status of our patients operated with internal, external or combined procedures.
METHODS
In a retrospective study, between July 2008 and July 2010 we reviewed 24 patients with available follow-up data. We reviewed the pre- and post-operative imaging available and the immediate follow-up data. A form is currently mailed to the patients to self-evaluate the general physical, mental and employment status, and also the affected limb, using general approved questionnaires. Data from this form is still in process.
RESULTS
In this clinic we recorded 24 patients with tibial plafond fractures (17 male, 7 female, 2.43 sex ratio), with ages between 18 and 82 years (average 46.5, median 39 years). According to AO/OTA classification, we noted 8 type A (2 A1, 3 A2, 3 A3) extra-articular tibial fractures, 9 type B (4 B1, 4 B2, 1 B3) intra-articular pilon fractures and 7 type C (3 C1, 1 C2, 3 C3) both epi- and metaphyseal tibial fractures, usually with peroneus fractures at various levels. 10 of these fractures were open, from them 3 type IIIA and 2 IIIB Gustilo-Anderson, and 3 of the patients were politrauma (1 L1 lumbar fracture and distal radius fracture, 1 cranio-cerebral trauma and type I open distal radius fracture and 1 cranio-cerebral trauma). We performed a large array of surgical procedures, usually in emergency, based mainly on the local soft tissue status and both the age and recovery needs of the patient. In old debilitated patients we preferred to use minimal internal osteosynthesis, usually applying a supplementary external fixator or cast. In young active patients we used MIPO techniques in tibial fractures, both with regular or locking-screw plates, repairing also the peroneus in order to preserve the limb length in diaphyseal fractures, and to reconstruct the ankle in lateral malleolus fractures. In cases with severe soft tissue impairment we delayed the definitive osteosynthesis using an external fixator. The short term outcome was good, noting only one septic nonunion, which healed with the appropriate treatment, one calcaneus pin track infection and one deterioration of the external fixator in an alcoholic patient. Data for the mid-term outcome is still under evaluation.
CONCLUSIONS
Choosing the appropriate procedure is vital for the outcome. Timing is important, especially in high energy trauma, when the proper surgery performed in emergency allowed us to overcome most of the possible complications. Short term results are encouraging, and the mid-term results will let us know if our attitude was correct.
