Abstract
Introduction
Distal radius fractures are one of the most common injuries attended in hospitals. Throughout the years the treatment has change from simple cast to ORIF.
Objectives
To compare the functional and radiographic results in the treatment of the distal intrarticular radial fractures treated by volar buttress plate (T plate AO® Synthes, Oberdorf, Suiza) and fixed volar angle locking plate (DVR® Depuy, Warsaw, Indiana, USA).
Material and Methods
We performed a comparative retrospective study between two series of patients treated by fixed volar angle locking plate (40 patients) or volar buttress plate (36 patients).
Distal radius fractures were classified by the AO/ASIF Müller classification after X-ray study in two views (Anteroposterios and lateral views), surgical treatment was indicated by the type of fracture (unstable fractures) and open fractures.
Demographic information was gathered, injury mechanism and postoperatory complications. The minimal follow-up was 10 months. We performed clinical and radiographic evaluations before surgery, postoperatory, to 3 months and at the end of the follow-up (Palmar tilt, radial inclination, radial height and the radioulnar index were measured). Lidström's and Quick Dash scale, by means of telephonic survey, were used for the functional evaluation.
Results
The time from fracture to surgery was on average 3.74 days in the group of DVR ® plates and 1.69 days for the group treated with T buttress plates. Henry's approach was realized in every case and the average time spent in surgery was 74 minutes for patients treated with T buttress plate and 80 minutes for patients treated with plate DVR®. In some cases K wires had to be used in 9 cases in the DVR® group and 7 in the other group.
DVR® group obtained better results in radiological evaluation except in the radial inclination.
In the Quick Dash scale, conducted a telephone survey, the average for the DVR® group was 26.40 (CI: 13.6 to 81.8) and 33.37 (CI: 10.2–90) for the group of T buttress plate (p=0.055).
Conclusion
The potential advantages of ORIF in the distal radius fractures are low complication rate, stable subchondral fixation and early active movement of the wrist in the postoperative period. The disadvantages are a high cost, greater complexity and surgical exposure. Locking plates were designed to prevent postoperative collapse of the fracture also allows a better fix system in osteoporotic bone.
Both types of plates obtained good results radiological and functional at the end of follow-up but we have obtained better results in the patients treated with locking plates
