Abstract
Introduction
Conservative treatment of Achilles tendon ruptures may lead to re-rupture. Open surgical repair entails a risk of skin necrosis or infection. Several percutaneous techniques have been used, like Tenolig® or Achillon®, but these techniques are costly and may be marred by wound healing problems. Ma and Griffith described a technique for percutaneous repair witch left the suture and the knot under the skin, thus reducing the risk for infection.
Material and Methods
From January 2001 to September 2006, we used this percutaneous treatment for 60 acute ruptures of Achille tendon. The repair was made under local anaesthesia, using a single or double absorbable suture. Postoperative care was 3 weeks immobilisation in a cast in equinus position with no weight bearing, followed by another 3 weeks in a cast with the ankle at 90° with progressive weight bearing.
Results
Mean follow-up was 19 months. Complications were 2 re-ruptures at 2 and 5 months respectively, 1 infection in a patient who presented with re-rupture after a previous surgical treatment, and 1 Achilles tendonitis. There was no sural nerve lesion. Mean time to return to working activities was 85 days and mean time to return to sports activities was 5 months. The three competitive sportsmen returned to sports at six months, at the same level. Monopodal weight-bearing was possible for all the patients except one. Hopping was not possible in eight cases. Walking on tiptoe was not possible in four cases. A 5° limitation of dorsiflexion of the ankle was observed in four patients. Clinical results were good with no loss in range of motion. The patients’ subjective evaluation was as follows: 18 judged the outcome as very satisfactory, 40 as satisfactory and two as poor.
Discussion
The percutaneous suture technique used in this series differs from other methods of surgical repair in being inexpensive. The only specific equipment required is a long needle with an eyelet, sufficiently rigid to transfix the tendon. In this study we had used a custom needle as the prototype of the “Suturach®” (FH Orthopedics, Heimsbrunn, France) needle which we now use.
The technique does not require expensive surgical material and above all, does not leave any foreign body externally in contact with the skin (5) which could be a source of local inflammation, or even of cutaneous necrosis (12). This is particularly important for countries with a hot climate where it is not customary to wear closely fitting shoes.
The technique used is reliable, reproducible and easily taught. In this series, it was performed by a number of operators with various levels of training.
Conclusion
Percutaneous suture of the Achilles tendon appears as a simple, rapid, effective, reproducible and inexpensive technique. It combines the advantages of open surgery with a low risk of re-rupture and those of functional treatment with a low risk of infection.
