Abstract
Introduction
treatment of femoral neck fractures in the physically active elderly, is still an open question. The comparison of total replacement and partial hip replacement showed substantial superiority of the first approach than the latter. We can not disregard the problems that THR can lead in the elderly: more surgical time, greater blood loss, major sacrifice of bone in osteoporotic subjects. The Tribofit® acetabular system, has the objective to overcome these problems with the implantation of a single 3mm soft, pliable buffer made of polycarbonate-urethane between the large diameter metal femoral head and the subchondral bone, thus replacing the articular cartilage. The surgical technique includes the reaming of the cartilage layer, the creation of a circumferential groove and the snap-fit insertion of the buffer.
The purpose of the prospective study was to evaluate the effectiveness of this approach in the treatment of femoral neck fractures in the elderly.
Materials and Methods
from September 2008 to July 2010 we performed 45 implants with the Tribofit® Acetabular Buffer (Active Implants®, Memphis TN, USA). The inclusion criteria for the study were: femoral neck fracture patients over 75 years of age, physically independent before the injury, with good life expectancy, mild or absent arthritis, absence of morphological alterations of the acetabulum. The average age of these patients was 81,2 (75–89), the sex distribution was 36 females and 9 males, with 22 fractures of the left hip and 23 of the right. In all cases an uncemented straight femoral stem was implanted.
We recorded per-operative blood loss and intra-per-operative problems encountered. Follow-up were performed at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months post-op with radiographic control and clinical examination. The clinical outcome was objectively measured by the Harris Hip Score, pain Visual Analogue Scale and SF-36 questionnaire.
Results
Of the 45 patients, 4 died of unrelated causes and 3 were lost to follow-up (2 due to cognitive impairment and 1 due to peri-prosthetic fracture of the femur). Of the 38 available for follow-up, all were followed at the staged time. No intra-operative problems were registered.
The mean HHS for these fractures patients was 74,2 at 6 months and 86 at 12 months (90–80 good; 80–70 fair). The mean pain VAS was 4,3 at 6 months and 2 at 12 months. The mean SF-36 Score was 52,3 at 6 months and 53,2 at 12 months.
Of the 38 followed, we had 2 dislocations in the third week post-op while the two patients were in a rehabilitation centre. Open reduction was carried out and in both cases the buffer was not dislodged.
Discussion and conclusions
we believe the results with this new type of prosthesis are encouraging and comparable to if not better than other prosthetic options in the literature for this difficult-to-treat patient population.
