Abstract
Introduction
Unicompartmental arthroplasty is still a controversial issue in knee replacement, mainly due to a marked variation in published survival rates of the implants. The aim of this study was to analyse possible risk factors for revision following Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasties (OUKA).
Material and methods
Since 1997 data for all patients with primary and revision knee arthroplasties performed in our department have been stored in a database. Selected for the present study was all primary OUKA performed in the period 1997–2006 as well as any revision following these operations until the end of 2008. We got information from The National Health Register and the CPR register about any revision performed at other institutions and date in case of death. Primary OUKA were grouped in three categories according to the experience of the surgeon: 1 for operation done by a surgeon who had performed less than 20 OUKA, 2 for operation by a surgeon who had performed 20–40, and 3 for operation by a surgeon who had performed more than 40. Risk of revision was analysed by Cox regression. Revisions due to pain as the only reason were excluded from the analyses. Age and gender of the patients, previous surgical intervention, operation time, and the experience of the surgeon were included as possible risk factors in the analysis.
Results
445 primary Oxford knee arthroplasties were included. These were followed by 46 revisions. The indications for the revisions were: aseptic loosening 16 knees, progression of the osteoarthritis to the lateral compartment 7 knees, dislocation of the polyethylene meniscus 5 knees, varus-valgus instability 3 knees, fracture of the medial tibia condyle 3 knees, collision of the polyethylene meniscus and the femur condyle 1 knee, and pain as the only reason 11 knees. Age and gender of the patients as well as previous surgical intervention in the knee in question were not correlated to the risk of revision. Operation time was correlated to risk of revision with decreasing risk with increasing operation time (p=0,001). The experience of the surgeon was also correlated to risk of revision with decreasing risk with increasing experience (p=0,02). The 6 years survival rate for an experienced surgeon using an operation time at 90 min. or more was 97,5 % compared to a survival rate at 78,7 % for an inexperienced surgeon with an operation time less than 90 min.
Conclusion
OUKA performed by an inexperienced surgeon and OUKA performed with short operation time had marked reduced survival rates. This seems to be an essential information to institutions performing OUKA.
