Abstract
Introduction
The treatment of trochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures remains controversial, and new implants are constantly being developed trying to improve outcome and minimize the number of complications in these fractures.
In Norway the Sliding Hip Screw(SHS), with or without a Trochanteric Stabilizing Plate (TSP), is still the most commonly used implant, but worldwide nailing of these fractures is increasing. This trend, however, has not been supported by documentation of better clinical results compared to the SHS in well designed studies. Therefore, in the present study we compared the recently launched Trigen Intertan nail (Smith and Nephew) with the SHS in the treatment of trochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures.
Patients and Methods
In a prospective, randomized multicenter study with 697 patients, we compared the Trigen Intertan nail with the SHS regarding postoperative pain, functional mobility, complications, and reoperation rates.
Patients older than 60 years with trochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures were included in 5 hospitals. At day 5, and 3 and 12 months postoperatively, pain was measured using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), and the Timed Up and Go-test (TUG-test) was performed to evaluate functional mobility. Complications and reoperations were recorded at discharge, and after 3 and 12 months.
Results
328 patients were evaluated at day 5 postoperatively. At mobilization patients treated with the nail had less pain compared to the SHS (VAS 47 vs. 53, p=0.02). Still, a difference of 6 points may not be of clinical significance. There was no difference in pain at rest or in early functional mobility. The length of postoperative hospital stay was also similar for the two groups (8.5 and 8.4 days respectively). At 3 (457 patients) and 12 months (374 patients) there was no difference in pain or TUG-test performance. At discharge, and after 3 and 12 months the overall reoperation rate for the groups was similar, and there was no difference regarding general complications. The results were comparable for the two groups, regardless of fracture classification (stable or unstable fractures). However, postoperative femoral fractures still seems to be an issue even with modern nails. 5 postoperative femoral fractures were encountered in the Intertan group, whereas 1 occurred in the SHS-group.
Conclusion
Overall, there was no major difference in the results for the Intertan nail and the SHS in our study. Both methods provided predictable and good results in the treatment of trochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures. We found however less pain at mobilization for patients operated with a nail at day 5 postoperatively compared to the SHS. No difference in pain or function was evident at any later follow up. There was no difference in reoperation rates between the groups, but more postoperative ipsilateral femoral fractures occurred in the Intertan group.
The clinical results in this study do not support the trend towards more nailing of trochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures.
