Abstract
Background
A number of studies have reported on the early failure of the Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. However, less evidence is available regarding the outcome following revision of failed unicompartmental knee prostheses to total knee arthroplasty. The aims of this study were to determine the time to failure for the Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and to assess the short-term outcome following revision surgery.
Methods
Details of consecutive patients undergoing revision of an Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty to a total knee arthroplasty at our centre between January 2000 and December 2009 were collected prospectively. Data was collected on patient demographics, indication for revision surgery, and time to revision from the index procedure. Clinical and radiological outcome following revision arthroplasty was also assessed.
Results
During the study period 22 (4.5%) of 494 Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasties were revised to a total knee arthroplasty. Mean age at the time of revision surgery was 61.8 yr and 13 (59%) patients were male. Mean time to revision surgery from the primary procedure was 3.0 yr (range 0.6–6.2 yr). The commonest reasons for revision were aseptic loosening of the femoral (n=9) or tibial component (n=2), and undiagnosed (n=5) or patellofemoral pain (n=2). All patients were revised to a cemented total knee arthroplasty with most not requiring bone grafts. During follow-up (range 0.5–4.5 yr) no further surgery was performed in the 22 patients. In addition, there were no major postoperative complications and no evidence of radiological failure.
Discussion
The present study demonstrates most failures of the Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty occur within three to four years following the index procedure and are due to aseptic component loosening. These findings are consistent with other published reports regarding the early failure of this particular prosthesis. The short-term outcome following revision surgery appears to be good, however longer follow-up periods are required to determine if these good results continue.
