Abstract
Introduction
The anterior mini-invasive approach to performing total hip arthroplasty (THA) is associated with less soft tissue damage and a shorter postoperative recovery than other methods. In August 2008, our hospital abandoned the traditional lateral Hardinge approach in favor of this new method. The purpose of this study was to measure changes in short-term clinical and radiological results and complications after the changeover.
Methods
We compared the first 100 patients operated after the changeover to the new method (MI group) to the last 100 patients operated using the traditional method (LH group). Clinical and radiological parameters and complications were recorded pre- and postoperatively and the collected data of the two groups were statistically analyzed and compared.
Results
There were no statistically significant differences between either group with regard to patient demographics or procedural data, placement of the femur component, postoperative leg discrepancy, prosthesis dislocation, blood transfusion, or postoperative dislocation of the components. The MI group had a significantly shorter hospital stay (p<0.001) and significantly fewer infections (p = 0.007) of the operative site. The LH group had a significantly shorter operative time (p<0.001), less bleeding (p = 0.035), less nerve damage (p = 0.013), and radiologically better positioning of the acetabular component regarding anteversion (p<0.001). Furthermore, a few other recorded surgical complications were more frequent in the MI group, but the difference was not statistically significant.
Interpretation
Our results show that the anterior approach correlates with faster postoperative recovery and less soft tissue damage with respect to the lateral approach. Since the changeover, we observed an increase in the overall complications, but in this study this increase was not found to be statistically significant. These complications were not only found in the initial patients operated with the mini-invasive approach, but were homogeneously spread over all 100 patients. Additionally, and perhaps most worrying was the clinically significant increase in intraoperative femur fractures in the MI group. The changeover to the anterior mini-invasive approach, which was the surgeons' initial experience with the MI technique, resulted in a drastic increase in the number of overall complications. A future randomized, prospective study including functional scores and a large body of patients will be imperative to show whether the two different approaches really are equivalent.
