Abstract
Background
Osteoarthritis of basal joint of the thumb represents one of the commonest degenerative diseases of the hand and wrist region. Depending on the severity of clinical symptoms surgical treatment is often recommended. Resection arthroplasty of the CMC joint with tendon interposition can be regarded as the gold standard. The aim of our study is to compare the Burton Pellegrini technique with a new modified technique of resection arthroplasty with interposition of local capsule tissue.
Materials and Methods
We retrospectively evaluated 2 groups of patients. Two Consultant Surgeons took part in the study, one for each group, with each consultant performing trapeziectomies using only one of the techiniques for all his patients. The first group underwent trapeziectomy and local capsule interposition. It consists of 26 patients with a female/male ratio of 20/6, an average age of 64 years (range 53–88), an average follow up of 3.15 years (range 9–1) and a left/right ratio of 16/10. The second group underwent a standard Burton Pellegrini including flexor tendon interposition. It consists of 13 patients with a female/male ratio of 5/8, an average age of 68 years (range 58–85), an average follow up of 4.46 years (range 9–1) and a left/right ratio of 5/8. The outcomes were compared using the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire. A 2-tailed independent samples t-test was used for the statistical analysis of our data.
Results
We found that there is significant difference between the two procedures only on the ability of working in present, t = 2.153 and p = 0.038. However, there is no significant difference between the other parameters we examined: overall hand function, t = 0.237 and p = 0.814; activities of daily living using the operated hand, t = 0.194 and p = 0.847; activities of daily living using both hands, t = 0.184 and p = 0.855; overall activities of daily living, t = 0.204 and p = 0.839; pain, t = 0.123 and p = 0.903; aesthetics, t = 1.063 and p = 0.295; satisfaction, t = 0.628 and p = 0.534; total score, t = 0.509 and p = 0.613. Furthermore, the overall score for the two procedures suggests that there is no significant difference between them.
Conclusions
The new modified procedure is simpler and quicker than the traditional operation and avoids the morbidity of tendon harvesting.
The overall outcome score for the two operations is equal, suggesting that there is no advantage to the more complex procedure.
We have shown a difference between the two procedures in post op working ability, being better in the group with local capsule interposition.
