header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

Spine

FUSION RATE FOLLOWING POSTERIOR PEDICLE SCREW CORRECTION IN ADOLESCENT IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS WITH GRAFTON DBM MATRIX STRIPS COMBINED WITH ALLOGRAFTS

Combined British Scoliosis Society/Nordic Spinal Deformity Society (BSS/NSDS)



Abstract

Purpose

Retrospective review of fusion rates using Grafton DBM/allografts only in AIS.

Methods

Medical records of 30 consecutive patients at an average age of 19(18-24)were reviewed. All patients had segmental fixation with dual rod and pedicle screw construct followed by decortication supplemented with matrix strips/allograft chips. Minimum follow up 1.5 years, average of 2 years (1.5-3). First follow up at 3 months postoperatively and than 6 months subsequently. All patients were evaluated using criteria described by Betz et al for “possible pseudoarthrosis” which included persistent back pain, defects in the fusion mass, loosening of pedicle screws, junctional kyphosis and curve progression of more than 10 degrees from initial standing postoperative PA views.

There were no infections. Average time to clinically and radiographically evident fusion was 12 months (range 10-16). Radiographically visible unfused facet joints were encountered in 3 patients towards the end of the construct. One patient had extension of the construct to treat junctional kyphosis. Other two remained asymptomatic. None had Progression of deformity. One patient developed pars defect at level below construct and was treated with extension of fusion.

Conclusion

Rate of fusion approaches 95% which favourably compares to that in literature. We acknowledge limitations inherent to retrospective design, lack of comparative group and CT analysis, nonetheless the study imparts information on the use of bone substitutes without autografts in a subset of spinal deformity patients.



Ethics: none

Interests: none