Abstract
Background
Autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) and mosaicplasty (MP) are two methods of repair of symptomatic articular cartilage defects in the adult knee. This study represents the only long-term comparative clinical trial of the two methods.
Methods
A prospective, randomised comparison of the two modalities involving 100 patients with symptomatic articular cartilage lesions was undertaken. Patients were followed for ten years. Pain and function were assessed using the modified Cincinnati score, Bentley Stanmore Functional rating system and visual analogue scores. ‘Failure’ was determined by pain, a poor outcome score and arthroscopic evidence of graft disintegration.
Results
Patients had a mean age at index operation of 31. There was a long mean pre-op duration of symptoms of seven years and the defects had an average of 1.5 operations (excluding arthroscopy) to the articular cartilage lesion prior to the cartilage repair surgery. The aetiology of the articular cartilage defects was mainly trauma; some patients had osteochondritis dissecans or chondromalacia patellae. Five patients were lost to follow-up. A total of 23 out of 42 mosaicplasty patients failed, 10 out of 58 ACI patients failed (p<0.001). Most patients did well for the first two years when there was a steep failure of mosaicplasty patients, after which the failure rate was more constant. There was a low steady failure rate of ACI over the 10 years. Older patients treated by ACI did worse than younger patients; age was less of a prognostic indicator in MP. Patients irrespective of gender or aetiology of the defect fared better with ACI than MP.
Conclusion
At ten years, patients who underwent cartilage repair using ACI fared significantly better than those who underwent mosaicplasty.
