Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare the outcome, complications and survival of the three most commonly used surgical reconstructions of the proximal humerus in adult patients after trans-articular tumour resection.
Method
Between1985 and 2005 thirty-eight consecutive proximal humeral reconstructions using either, allograft-prosthesis composite (n=10), osteoarticular allograft (n=13) or a modular tumour prosthesis (n=14), were performed in our clinic. Their mean follow-up was ten years (nine months to 25 years). Of these, twenty-seven were disease free at latest follow-up (Mean follow-up 16.8 years) and ten had died of disease (4.2 years). Complications and implant survival with revision surgery as end-point are presented for the total group of patients, functional scores for surviving patients only.
Results
The endoprosthetic group presented the smallest complication rate of 21%, compared to 40% in the allograftprosthesis- composite and 62% in the osteoarticular allograft group. Only one revision was performed in the endoprosthetic group, in a case of shoulder instability. Infection after revision (n=3), pseudoarthrosis (n=2), fracture of the allograft (n=3), and shoulder instability (n=4) were major complications of allograft use in general. Kaplan-Meier-analysis showed a significantly better implant survival for the endoprosthetic group (log-rank p=0.002). At final follow-up the MusculoSkeletal Tumour Society scores averaged at; 72% for the allograft-prosthetic-composite (n=7, mean follow-up 19 years), 76% for the osteoarticular allograft (n=3, 16 years), and 77% for the endoprosthetic reconstruction (n=10, 6 years) groups.
Conclusion
An endoprosthetic reconstruction after trans-articular proximal humeral resection resulted in the lowest complication rate, highest implant survival and comparable functional results when compared to allograft-prosthesiscomposite and osteoarticular-allograft use. For all types of reconstruction, gleno-humeral instability remains a major cause of dysfunction at long-term FU. We believe that the additional use of a knitted tube surrounding the humeral prosthesis may have decreased the high incidence of this complication reported in recent literature.
