Abstract
To assess how effective are the prognostic scores and the role of delayed presentation in predicting the outcomes in patients with metastatic spine disease.
Retrospectively data collected from December 2006 to December 2009. Medical records review included types of tumours, duration of symptoms, duration from referral to definitive treatment, expected survival, functional status before and after treatment. Karnofsky performance score and Modified Tokuhashi were used.
Results: 50 patients underwent surgical stabilisation for metastatic spine disease with or with out cord compression. Age ranged from 39 to 87 years (Avg: 64). Patients had four main types of tumours; (Myeloma 30%, Lymphoma 22% Lung CA 16% and Renal 12 %).
Inpatients without cord compression, the average time from referral to definitive treatment is 17 days. Over all fictional status improved in 70% of cases following surgical intervention. Patients who presented with cord compression had surgery with in 49 hours. Patients with high prognostic scores did not survive as long as expected. On the contrary, patients with poor prognostic scores survived longer than expected. This discrepancy is significant in patients with lung and renal malignancies. Patients with Myeloma did well as per the prognostic scores.
Prognostic scores are not uniformly effective in all types of malignancies. Factors like delayed presentation and general condition were not included in the prognostic factors. Hence, we conclude that we cannot make a decision purely based on the prognostic scores to perform either palliative or definitive surgery.
