Abstract
The purpose of our study was to assess the reproducibility and reliability of traditional radiographic methods of diagnosing trochlear dysplasia compared with the gold standard of MRI.
Plain radiographs and MRI scans of 36 knees in 28 patients with proven trochlear dysplasia were compared with 18 controls in a single surgeon's practice. The sulcus angle on MRI and axial radiographs was measured. The lateral radiograph was assessed for adequacy, the crossing sign and the trochlear bump sign.
The mean axial (radiograph) and MRI sulcus angles in the dysplastic group were 145° and 158° respectively (p=0.0001) compared to 135° and 138° in the control group (p=0.09). The crossing sign was present in 34 out of 36 lateral radiographs in the dysplastic group and 8 out of 18 in the control group equating to a sensitivity of 94% and specificity of 56%. The quality of the lateral radiograph did not significantly alter the sensitivity or specificity of the crossing sign (p=0.01). The bump sign was present in 22 out of 36 lateral radiographs in the dysplastic group and 1 out of 18 in the control group equating to a sensitivity of 61% and specificity of 94%.
Our study shows that an increased radiographic sulcus angle is reliable in diagnosing trochlear dysplasia but underestimates it. The bump sign is a reliable predictor of trochlear dysplasia. The crossing sign is sensitive but not specific in diagnosing dysplasia.
