Abstract
Introduction
Rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is a common injury and often presents with a typical injury pattern. Historic literature has shown that the accuracy of diagnosis of ACL ruptures is poor at the initial medical consultation despite the history of injury strongly suggesting an ACL injury. The aims of this study were to determine: if the accuracy of diagnosis of ACL ruptures at initial presentation has improved over the last decade; grade of medical staff at initial and subsequent consultations; the mechanism of injury; and the subsequent delay in diagnosis and definitive treatment.
Materials and Methods
One hundred and thirty two consecutive patients who underwent ACL reconstruction between January 2005 and January 2009 were analysed using prospective collected data. The mean age of the patients was 29 years (12-57). Sixteen patients were excluded due to chronic ACL injury (15).
Results
One hundred and sixteen patients (117 ACL ruptures) were included in the analysis. A typical injury pattern was documented in 87 (75%) of cases. The most common sporting activities associated with an ACL injury were football (35.3%), skiing (21.6%), rugby (10.3%) and other (32.8%). The vast majority of patients (68.1%) sought medical attention within 1 week from time of injury. The diagnosis of an ACL rupture was made in 33 cases (28%) at the initial medical consultation. The diagnosis was made in 13 (11%) of cases with the use of MRI and 6 (5%) cases at arthroscopy. The most common diagnoses made in cases of failed ACL rupture diagnosis were medial meniscal tear (10.3%), medial collateral ligament injury (7.8%) and none (33.6%). The mean time to diagnosis was 21 weeks (0-192) and the mean time to ACL reconstruction was 44 weeks (1-240).
Conclusions
Despite a typical mechanism of injury leading to ACL rupture the rate of initial diagnosis remains poor. This often leads to an unnecessary delay in diagnosis and subsequent treatment. Possible reasons for this are discussed.
