Abstract
INTRODUCTION
Mobile bearing unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) is an accepted treatment for patients with isolated medial unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis (OA) with a full thickness cartilage loss. The aim of this study was to determine if this recommendation was correct and if the procedure could be used for partial-thickness cartilage loss.
METHODS
1053 Oxford medial UKRs were studied prospectively. The knees were divided into two groups; partial-thickness cartilage loss (PTCL) group and the full thickness-cartilage loss (FTCL) group. The primary outcome measure was the total Oxford Knee Score (OKS, 0 to 48) at the time of final follow up. The groups were also compared for the change in OKS (?OKS) and the proportion of patients that were considered to have benefited substantially from surgery (?OKS >5).
RESULTS
There were 21 knees in the PTCL group, with a mean age of 61 years (SD 13) and mean follow-up of 1.7 years (SD 1.0). There were 1032 knees in the FTCL group, with a mean age of 66 years (SD 10) and mean follow-up of 3.9 years (SD 2.5). The PTCL group had a significantly lower (p=0.03) total OKS (mean 35.8, SD 10.7) at final review than the FTCL group (mean 39.8, SD 8.5). There was no significant difference in pre-operative or ?OKS between the groups. However the proportion of patients that did not have substantial benefit from surgery (?OKS>5) was significant lower (p=0.04) in the PTCL group.
CONCLUSIONS
The results confirm that a good outcome can routinely be achieved with UKR if there is bone-on-bone. If there is partial loss of cartilage the results are less predictable. Although some patients do well, a higher proportion do not benefit from the surgery. It may be that in a subgroup of these patients the pain did not initially arise from the partially damaged cartilage. We therefore recommend that the Oxford Knee should only be used for medial OA if there is bone on bone.
