Abstract
Introduction
The addition of hydroxyapatite in cementless total knee arthroplasty is believed to reduce the time for implant fixation and rehabilitation, reduce the incidence of RLLs and provide long lasting implant stability, through improved osseointegration. We report the results of a prospective, randomised controlled single blinded study comparing the post operative pain, biological fixation and clinical outcomes with the LCS Complete Porocoat and the hydroxyapatite-coated, LCS Complete Duofix mobile-bearing knee systems.
Methods
Two hundred and four patients for TKA were prospectively recruited into the study between November 2006 and November 2008. Subjects were randomly assigned to receive the LCS Complete Duofix or LCS Complete Porocoat knee systems. Outcomes including VAS pain scores, American Knee Society scores and Oxford knee scores were performed pre-operatively and at 3 months. X-rays were analysed by an independent reviewer for the presence of radiolucent lines.
Results
At no time point from immediately post-operatively to 3 months post-operatively was there a statistically significant difference between groups, in terms of reduction in pain, as measured by the VAS pain score (p=0.9575). American Knee Society and Oxford Knee scores showed similar results between groups. In terms of fixation of the prostheses, radiological analysis revealed a statistical difference between the study groups, Odds Ratio 28.17 (3.670, 216.3), with Duofix having fewer radiolucent lines than Porocoat. 25% of the Porocoat tibias were assessed as not fixated at 3 months whereas only 1% of the Duofix tibias were considered not fixated. There was no significant difference in pain between the fixated and not fixated groups (p=0.293).
Conclusions
The addition of hydroxyapatite did not make a significant difference in terms of pain or functional outcomes in the early post-operative period, but did reduce the incidence of radiolucent lines. The presence of radiolucent lines was not associated with increased pain.
