Abstract
We did a retrospective comparative analysis of twenty five patients treated with Ilizarov bone transport [IBT] and twenty one patients treated with vascularised fibular graft [VFG] from 1994 to 2003 in one institution, for post traumatic tibial bone defects of more than six centimetres.
The aim of the study was to find out if there were any differences in achieving radiological end points, bone and functional score and return to work (final outcome), hospital stay and operating time (logistic factors) and complication rates. The mean defect size in the IBT group was 11.9 centimetres and in the VFG group 14.6 centimetres.
Twenty one and sixteen patients in the IBT and VFG group respectively achieved the radiological end point that is union of the defect and graft hypertrophy [p 0.5]. Nineteen patients in the IBT group and fifteen in the VFG group returned to productive work [p 0.72]. Bone and functional results were analyzed by Paley's evaluation system and there were no significant differences in the two groups of patients [bone result p 0.97 and functional result p 0.1]. The logistic factors were significantly less of IBT group [p < 0.05]. Two patients in the IBT group and one patient in the VFG group had amputation and one patient in VFG group died. Three cases in the VFG group had flap loss. Stress fracture of the graft occurred in eight patients in the VFG group [p 0.0007].
The final outcome was same in both groups. Hospital stay, operating time and refractures were significantly less in IBT group.
