header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

General Orthopaedics

ARE WE GETTING BETTER AT DIAGNOSING SARCOMAS?

British Orthopaedic Association (BOA) 2007



Abstract

Objective

Sarcomas are a rare group of tumours, which pose numerous problems regarding correct diagnosis and appropriate management. This study aimed to examine whether symptom duration and tumour size at diagnosis have changed over time, using size and symptom duration as methods of comparison.

Methods

All patients diagnosed with sarcoma were identified retrospectively from a prospective database from 1963 to 2005. Demographic data concerning age at diagnosis, sex and diagnosis were recorded. Data were also collected on duration of symptoms and size of tumour at diagnosis. Symptom duration is defined as the length of time the patient was experiencing symptoms for until the date of diagnosis. Changes in size and symptom duration over time were compared by grouping date of diagnosis into time periods and comparing them against each other using non-parametric statistical analysis.

Results

4560 met our inclusion and exclusion criteria, with 2492 Bone Sarcomas (BS) and 2068 Soft Tissue Sarcomas (STS). Overall analysis of both BS and STS showed that size at diagnosis has decreased and symptom duration has increased. Analysis of STS showed that size has decreased over time, particularly following the introduction of referral guidelines in 1999 (median size pre 99 = 10cm, post = 8cm, Mann-Whitney-U test p=0.000 to 3 sig. fig.), but symptom duration has remained unaltered over time. Duration of symptoms reported for BS has significantly increased over time; however, size at diagnosis has remained unchanged over time.

Conclusions

It appears from this study that STS are being diagnosed more quickly and that this is most likely due to the introduction of specific STS guidelines in 1999. This result is particularly heartening, and should encourage further promotion of such guidelines. Awareness of BS still appears to be low as size at diagnosis remains unchanged over time.