header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

Research

GAIT ANALYSIS IN YOUR HAND: FEASIBILITY STUDY EVALUATING AN AI APPROACH TO GAIT ANALYSIS USING MONOCULAR VIDEO FROM MOBILE PHONES

The European Orthopaedic Research Society (EORS) 31st Annual Meeting, Porto, Portugal, 27–29 September 2023. Part 1 of 2.



Abstract

Gait analysis is an indispensable tool for scientific assessment and treatment of individuals whose ability to walk is impaired. The high cost of installation and operation are a major limitation for wide-spread use in clinical routine.

Advances in Artificial Intelligence (AI) could significantly reduce the required instrumentation. A mobile phone could be all equipment necessary for 3D gait analysis. MediaPipe Pose provided by Google Research is such a Machine Learning approach for human body tracking from monocular RGB video frames that is detecting 3D-landmarks of the human body.

Aim of this study was to analyze the accuracy of gait phase detection based on the joint landmarks identified by the AI system.

Motion data from 10 healthy volunteers walking on a treadmill with a fixed speed of 4.5km/h (Callis, Sprintex, Germany) was sampled with a mobile phone (iPhone SE 2nd Generation, Apple). The video was processed with Mediapipe Pose (Version 0.9.1.0) using custom python software. Gait phases (Initial Contact - IC and Toe Off - TO) were detected from the angular velocities of the lower legs. For the determination of ground truth, the movement was simultaneously recorded with the AS-200 System (LaiTronic GmbH, Innsbruck, Austria).

The number of detected strides, the error in IC detection and stance phase duration was calculated.

In total, 1692 strides were detected from the reference system during the trials from which the AI-system identified 679 strides. The absolute mean error (AME) in IC detection was 39.3 ± 36.6 ms while the AME for stance duration was 187.6 ± 140 ms.

Landmark detection is a challenging task for the AI-system as can clearly be seen be the rate of only 40% detected strides. As mentioned by Fadillioglu et al., error in TO-detection is higher than in IC-detection.


Email: