Abstract
Introduction
Pitting damage on implants has been reported and attributed to use of electrocautery. This study aimed to distinguish how different TKA bearing surfaces are susceptible to this type of damage and whether surgeons were aware that this damage can occur.
Methods
A survey was sent to Hip and Knee Society members to determine what percentage of adult reconstructive surgeons use electrocautery after implantation of components. Three bearing surfaces for primary TKA were selected: CoCr, Oxinium, and zirconium nitride (ZrN) to be damaged by electrocautery with a monopolar (MP, Bovie) and bipolar (BP, Aquamantys) electrocautery with three different energy settings. A comparison of surface damage and backscatter elemental analysis using SEM was performed. Average roughness (Ra), maximal peak-to-valley height (Rz,), kurtosis (Rk), and skewness (Rsk) measurements were collected using a profilometer (DektakXT, Bruker, Tucson, AZ) with a 2.5µm radius stylus to assess an area of 3.8mm by 3.2mm in the central portion of the area for each MP and BP energy setting used to impart damage to the bearing surfaces. A similar undamaged area for each bearing surface was also measured for roughness parameter comparison.
Results
Median Rz and Ra measurements were larger for BP damaged areas compared to MP for all bearing surfaces.(Table 1) The Oxinium surface had the greatest increase in roughness parameters of all three bearing surfaces tested. Survey results indicate that a significant percentage of adult reconstructive surgeons use the electrocautery after implants are in place and are not aware of this type of damage. Backscatter SEM analysis found significant changes for BP damage compared to MP.
Conclusion
Our in vitro study determined surface damage caused by electrocautery can have significant effects on the bearing surfaces of implants. Our survey determined many arthroplasty experts are unaware that this damage can occur.
For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly.
