Abstract
Introduction
We are a high-volume arthroplasty unit performing over 800 primary THRs annually at an approximate reimbursement of £6.5 million to the Trust. 70% are hybrid and we have been using the Taperfit - Trinity combination (Corin, Cirencester) since March 2016. We aimed to investigate the potential cost-savings and clinical benefits of instrument rationalisation using this system following GIRFT principles.
Methods
Taperfit (ODEP 10A) is a polished, collarless, double tapered stem available in multiple sizes/offsets. Trinity is a hemispherical porous titanium cementless shell. A prospective audit of implant size was performed for the first 50 cases. Based on these findings, instruments were reduced to a single tray per component based on predicted size, named ‘Corin Hip for the Osteoarthritic Patient’ (CHOP). A further re-audit was performed to confirm correct tray constituent sizes. Financial data were calculated using known TSSU costs of approximately £50 per tray.
Results
The audit revealed 92% (46/50) of stem sizes 2 or smaller and 86% (43/50) of shell sizes 54 or smaller. Trays per case were then rationalised from 6 to 2. Each acetabular tray had seven reamers (‘CHOP 1’ 42, 46–56 or CHOP 2 46, 54–64) and each femoral tray had broaches sized 0–2 (CHOP 1) or 2–4 (CHOP 2). Re-audit confirmed the CHOP 1 sets covered approximately 85% of cases. A TSSU saving of £192/case was achieved. Additional benefits were: all trays easily kept under laminar flow, time spent counting instruments was reduced and theatre shelving space liberated.
Conclusion
Rationalisation of surgical instruments has saved the Trust approximately £100,000/year. Fewer instruments potentially reduce the risk of ‘never events’ and infection. Industry savings on consigned instruments have been passed on with significant reduction in our implant procurement costs allowing the use of hybrid implants for the price of our all cemented combination.
