Abstract
Background
Evidence supports that dysfunction of descending inhibition (endogenous analgesic (EA) modulation) contributes towards chronic pain conditions. Research suggests that manual therapy may influence EA modulation; however, this is poorly understood. Trials testing the effect of sustained digital pressure, a commonly used manual therapy technique, using pain pressure threshold (PPT) would give us a better understanding of the influence of manual therapy on EA modulation. A measurement of PPT has been shown to be most effective using fingertip pressure due to the palpatory feedback of symptomatic tissues.
Design
A cross-sectional observational study, utilizing a repeated measure approach.
Aim
The aim of this research study is to provide preliminary data on the variability of pressure in sustained fingertip pressure in comparison to algometer guided pressure.
Methods
Utilizing a pressure algometer, 26 participants were used to test the variability of fingertip pressure in comparison to algometer guided pressure, over 120 seconds. In a randomized order and utilizing two sheets of skin, participants tried to attain, and sustain, a targeted pressure. In the fingertip pressure condition, participants were blinded to the exerted pressure.
Conclusion
It was determined that, on average, participants were able to attain the target pressure, but this was highly variable from trial to trial. The test-retest measurement concluded that participants' accuracy was reproducible. Participants were not reproducible in variability when completing the test-retest measurement. There was a relatively higher variability with the lower pressures tested. The order in which the trial was performed, and type of skin did not affect the variability. It was concluded that, whilst some practitioners appear to have a high degree of accuracy with low variability of sustained finger-tip pressure, across a sample population this was not the case bringing into question the mechanism of effect of this common manual therapy technique.
Conflict of interest: None
Funding: None
