Abstract
Introduction
This study explores whether subjects with bicruciate retaining TKRs (BiCR) have more normal knee biomechanics during level walking and stair ascent than subjects with posterior cruciate retaining TKRs (PCR). Due to anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) preservation, we expect BiCR subjects will not show the reduced flexion and altered muscle activation patterns characteristic of persons with TKRs.
Methods
Motion and electromyography (EMG) data were collected during level walking and stair climbing for 16 BiCR subjects (4/12 m/f, 65±3 years, 30.7±7.0 BMI, 8/8 R/L), 17 PCR subjects (2/15 m/f, 65±7 years, 30.4±5.1 BMI, 7/10 R/L), and 17 elderly healthy control subjects (8/9 m/f, 55±10 years, 25.8±4.0 BMI, 10/7 R/L), using the point cluster marker set. Surface EMG electrodes were placed on the vastus medialis obliquus (VMO), rectus femoris (RF), biceps femoris (BF), and semitendinosus (ST) muscles. EMG data are reported as percent relative voluntary contraction (%RVC), normalized to the average peak EMG signals during level walking. Statistical nonparametric mapping was used for waveform analysis.
Results
Both TKR groups were older, and PCR subjects had higher BMI than control subjects (p≤0.020). The BiCR group walked slower and with shorter stride lengths than controls (p≤0.012). During level walking, BiCR subjects had less knee extension and posterior tibial displacement than controls (95–98%, 96–100% gait cycle, p=0.003, 0.001). PCR subjects showed higher flexion mid-stance than controls (36–44% gait cycle, p=0.001) and more external rotation (66–69% gait cycle, p=0.003). Both TKR groups had smaller extension moment peaks (PCR 5, 59–75, 96%, BiCR 61–78, 95–97% stance, p≤0.007, 0.003) than the control group. The BiCR group had smaller adduction and external rotation moment peaks (20–24%, 10–18% stance, p=0.003, 0.001) compared with controls. During stair climbing, BiCR subjects displayed more external tibial rotation (4–16% stance), more knee abduction (36–52% stance), and a lower adduction moment peak (24–34% stance) compared to healthy controls (p≤0.005). TKR subjects from both groups showed lower flexion moment peaks than controls (PCR 24–35%, BiCR 24–28% stance, p≤0.001, 0.004). For EMG, PCR subjects had more BF activity during stair ascent versus level walking than healthy subjects (56–74% stance, p≤0.001).
Discussion
BiCR and PCR showed more similarities than expected. Both had altered kinematics and kinetics compared to controls, suggesting some intrinsic extensor mechanism weakness, possibly an aftereffect of osteoarthritis. The EMG results agreed accordingly, as both TKR groups showed (non-significant) decreased quadriceps activity during stair climbing. Interestingly, PCR subjects also had more BF activity during stair than healthy controls, a trend that is common for both TKR subjects and people with ACL deficiency. On the other hand, although BiCR subjects were significantly more externally rotated in early stance phase for stair climbing, their rotation patterns began to align more closely to those of the healthy control subjects at lower flexion angles where the ACL should come into play. In conclusion, ACL retention in TKRs does not correct the extensor mechanism deficits commonly found in TKR patients, although it has some effect on secondary knee kinematics and hamstring muscle activity.
