Abstract
Cuff tear arthropathy represents a challenge to the shoulder arthoplasty surgeon. The poor results of conventional total shoulder arthroplasty in cuff deficient shoulders secondary to glenoid component loosening have meant hemiarthroplasty has traditionally been the preferred surgical option. Recently reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) has gained increasing popularity due to a clinical perception of an improved functional outcome, despite the absence of comparative data. The aim of this study was to compare the early functional results of Hemiarthroplasty versus RSA in the management of cuff-tear arthropathy.
102 primary hemiarthroplasties performed for cuff tear arthropathy were compared against 102 RSAs performed for the same diagnosis. Patients were identified from the New Zealand National Joint Registry and matched for age, sex, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) scores. Oxford shoulder scores (OSS) were collected at 6 months and 5 years post operatively and were compared between the two groups, together with mortality and re-revision rates.
There were 51 males and 51 females in each group, with a mean age of 71.6 in the Hemiarthroplasty group and 72.6 in the RSA group. The mean ASA score was 2.2 in both groups. The mean OSS was 31.1 in the hemiar-throplasty group and 38.1 in the RSA group. At follow up, there were 7 revisions in the hemiarthroplasty group and 5 in the RSA group. No difference in mortality was seen between the two groups.
This study provides the first direct evidence of a improved functional outcome of RSA compared to Hemiarthroplasty in the treatment of patients with cuff tear arthropathy. Longer term follow up is needed to confirm that the improved function is maintained, and that late complications such as component loosening remain comparable between the two groups.
Correspondence should be addressed to: Associate Professor N. Susan Stott, Orthopaedic Department, Starship Children’s Hospital, Private Bag 92024, Auckland, New Zealand.
