OSTEOTOMY AND UNICOMPARTMENTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT CONVERTED TO TOTAL KNEE REPLACMENT – DATA FROM THE NEW ZEALAND JOINT REGISTRY

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the surgical options for unicompartmental osteoarthritis (OA) in younger patients by comparing the survivorship and functional results of Total Knee Replacement (TKR) following osteotomy with the results for both primary TKR and revision of Unicompartmental Knee Replacement (UKR) to a TKR, and thereby recommend the most appropriate index procedure for this group of patients.

We reviewed the revision rate and functional outcome of all patients who had a total knee replacement (TKR) following an osteotomy or Unicompartmental Knee Replacement (UKR) on the New Zealand Joint Registry. We used this data to compare the results to primary TKR scores, including comparison of age-matched subgroups.

There were 711 patients who had undergone TKR as salvage for a failed osteotomy with a revision rate of 1.33 revisions per 100 component years and a mean Oxford knee score (OKS) of 36.9. 205 patients had failed UKR converted to TKR with a revision rate of 1.97 revisions per 100 component years and a mean OKS of 29.1. The revision scores of TKR for both failed osteotomy and failed UKR were significantly poorer than following primary TKR (p← 0.05). The mean OKS following revision of a UKR was significantly poorer than both primary TKR (p←0.001) and TKR for a failed osteotomy (p←0.001). There was no significant difference in mean OKS between primary TKR and TKR for a failed osteotomy, even amongst patients younger than 65 years (p=0.8).

This study has shown that if a surgeon is choosing between an osteotomy and a UKR in the younger patient than the better for any subsequent revision procedure will be achieved with an osteotomy. Revision of a failed osteotomy to a TKR has improved functional results compared to revision of a failed UKR. However, both yield poor survivorship rate compared to primary TKR.