Abstract
Controversy still remains as to whether patella resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) should be conducted as a matter of routine. Some authors recommend routine resurfacing of the patella and advocate this due to the reduction in post-operative anterior knee pain and the reduction in requirement for revision surgery.
A database search was conducted to identify prospective randomized controlled studies only. Eighteen prospective randomized trials were identified and found eligible for inclusion. A cumulative sample of 8006 knees were involved, 3418 undergoing resurfacing and 4588 undergoing no resurfacing. Primary outcome data extracted was incidence of secondary operations, incidence of anterior knee pain and functional outcome scores including subgroup analysis of the type of prosthesis used in each study. Der Simonian Laird metanalysis was conducted if studies were found to be homogenous where statistical significance was defined as an overall alpha error of < 0.05.
No statistically significant differences were found to exist between patients undergoing patella resurfacing as a primary total knee replacement and those who preserved the native patella. No differences could be found between specific prosthetic design when subgroup analysis was conducted.
The study does not offer evidence to suggest any advantage of resurfacing versus non-resurfacing. Furthermore, no significant discrepancy existed when comparing different types of total knee prosthesis. This may be due that all the knees analysed are designed to be patella friendly and allow conformity of articulation of both a native and patella button equally
Correspondence should be addressed to Anastasia C. Tilentzoglou MD, General Secretary of the Board of Directors of HAOST, 20 A. Fleming Str. (N.Filothei), Gr. 15123 Maroussi, Athens Greece. E-mail: info@eexot.gr
