Abstract
Introduction: We present the results of the Ankle Evolution System (AES) total ankle replacements with a minimum follow up of four years.
Methods: Forty-five consecutive patients who had AES ankle replacement were included in the study. The mean age at operation was 64.6 (50–77). Pain and function were assessed using the AOFAS score. Patients had standardised AP and lateral weight bearing radiographs and were assessed for loosening and alignment. Patients’ satisfaction and complications were recorded. The survival of the implant was constructed using the Kaplan-Meier survival curve.
Results: The mean follow up for our patients who were alive and available for follow up at the final clinical review (40 patients) was 57.8 months (48–80). A total of 2 patients were revised (One patient sustained talar fracture and was converted to arthrodesis at three years postoperatively. The second patient had revision of the tibial component because of aseptic loosening at 4 years postoperatively). The mean total AOFAS score was 88.1 (53–100). For pain the mean score was 35.8 (20–40). Nine patients showed osteolysis only 2 were considered as significant. Those patients had minimal symptoms that were not progressing and further surgery was not justified. Ten patients presented with edge loading of which nine had corrective surgery. Our cohort showed high patients’ satisfaction. Our cumulative survival rate at 6 years was 94.7% with revision or decision to revise as the endpoint
Conclusion: The medium term results of the mobile AES total ankle replacement in terms of survivorship, functional outcome and patients’ satisfaction are satisfactory but we have our concerns about the high rate of osteolysis. The long-term benefit of this procedure has yet to be determined.
The abstracts were prepared by Mr Matt Costa and Mr Ben Ollivere. Correspondence should be addressed to Mr Costa at Clinical Sciences Research Institute, University of Warwick, Clifford Bridge Road, Coventry CV2 2DX, UK.
