Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

MEDIAL APPROACH TO HIND FOOT ARTHRODESIS



Abstract

Hind foot arthrodesis through traditional lateral approach in patient with severe valgus deformity carries a significant risk of wound breakdowns, infection and the risk of sural nerve damage. It is also difficult to fully correct a severe valgus deformity through the lateral approach. To overcome some these problems a medial approach has been recommended. Few authors have reported good results in a small series of cases.

We present a retrospective review of 18 consecutive patients with valgus hind foot deformity who underwent hind foot arthrodesis via a medial approach. There were 10 male and 8 female with an average age of 55 years (range 28–75years). The indications included osteoarthritis in 13; post traumatic OA in 3 and rheumatoid arthritis in 2. The mean pre-op subtalar valgus angle was 32o (range 12 – 49) and mean post op valgus angle was 17 (range 10 – 25). All the wounds healed primarily and there were no incidence of wound breakdown or infection. None of the patients developed neuro-vascular complications. The average time for fusion was 5.6 months (range 3–9). Two patients needed further surgical intervention, one for FHL tethering at the fusion site and one for non-union of subtalar joint in a chronic smoker.

The medial approach not only allows a safe and fantastic access to subtalar joint making correction of valgus deformity easier but is also extendable to include talo- navicular and naviculo-cunieform fusion and FDL transfer as additional procedures through the same approach as and when indicated

In conclusion we recommend the medial approach for performing subtalar arthrodesis in valgus hind foot deformities


Correspondence should be sent to: Phillip Saville, Kings Mill Hospital, Trauma and Orthopaedics, Sutton-in-Ashfield, United Kingdom, psaville@doctors.org.uk

The abstracts were prepared by Mr Matt Costa and Mr Ben Ollivere. Correspondence should be addressed to Mr Costa at Clinical Sciences Research Institute, University of Warwick, Clifford Bridge Road, Coventry CV2 2DX, UK.