173. MANAGEMENT OF MULTIPLE LIGAMENT INJURED KNEE: A SURVEY OF CURRENT PRACTICE IN CANADA

Abstract

Purpose: Treatment of knee dislocations remains challenging and controversial. Several strategies for the management of multiple ligament knee injuries have been described and there are multiple unresolved questions. These include the indications for surgery, repair versus reconstruction, surgical timing and graft selection. The aim of this survey was to identify areas of agreement and controversy, to define the current standard of care and help generate research questions.

Method: Using the standard techniques for survey development we presented six clinical scenarios of acute knee dislocations (at least three ligaments) to all orthopaedic surgeons affiliated with Canadian medical schools. The scenarios were designed to cover the common combinations of knee dislocations in both a 25 year old active individual and a 50 year old sedentary individual. The responses were divided into three groups. Group A consisted of those with fellowship training, or practices focused on, sports knee. Group B was comprised of surgeons with trauma fellowship or a sub-specialty trauma practice. Group C were the remaining surgeons without these subspecialty foci. We report on the responses of groups A and B.

Results: An average of ten different treatment algorithms were reported for each scenario but there was agreement on the need for early surgical management in the young active individual with a knee dislocation and all dislocations involving a lateral sided injury. Conversely, there was a lack of consensus regarding the need for surgical treatment of the 50 year old individual with bi-cruciate injury and medial collateral ligament. The most common combinations of reconstruction and repair are reported for each clinical scenario. Surgeons strongly favor early surgical intervention, within three weeks of injury, except for the 50 year old sedentary individual with a bi-cruciate plus medial sided injury. Allograft was the most popular choice to reconstruct the PCL and lateral ligament. For the ACL graft there was a near equal distribution between hamstrings, patellar tendon and the use allograft tissue.

Conclusion: In the absence of higher level evidence, the information from this survey helps define the standard of care in Canada and identifies areas of controversy which would be a priority for a multi-centre prospective trial.