88. JOINT PERCEPTION AFTER HIP OR KNEE REPLACEMENT1 SURGERY

Abstract

Purpose: The goal of this study is to compare patients’ perception of their hip or knee joint following joint replacement surgery.

Method: A total of 357 patients who underwent hip or knee joint surgery were included in the study. Of the patients who had knee replacement surgery, 46 had unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) and 119 had total knee replacement (TKR). In the group of patients who had hip replacement surgery, 98 underwent hip resurfacing (SRA) and 97 had total hip replacements (THR). The perception patients had of their replaced articulation as well as functional outcome scores such as the WOMAC and SF-36 were measured at one year post-surgery and compared between the four groups.

Results: Although global satisfaction and clinical outcome scores were excellent in all four groups, WOMAC scores at 1–2 year follow-up were significantly different between hip or knee replacement surgery (p< 0.0001). Also, the perception that patients had of their reconstructed joint was significantly different between the hip and knee groups (p< 0.001). Half of patients from the hip group considered their replaced hip “as a natural joint” and 76% considered their joint as having no functional limitations compared to only 19% and 39% respectively for the knee group. Of patients with knee joint surgery, 14% (20/165) considered their joint as “artificial with important limitations” as opposed to only 1% (2/195) of those who had hip joint surgery. There were no significant differences in Womac scores or perception when comparing TKR and UKR or THR and SRA patients. Perception was strongly correlated to Womac scores for all four groups (R²=0.951).

Conclusion: Hip and knee joint replacement surgery are recognized as highly effective medical interventions in terms of cost/benefit ratio in current medical practice. It is remarkable to see that replacement of each of these articulations can yield vastly different results in terms of patient function, perception and satisfaction. From this study, it is clear that research in prosthetic development and surgical techniques should be focused on the interventions such as knee joint replacement, which are not yet capable of offering both a high level of function and satisfaction to patients.