Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

69. IMPACT OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS ON SURGICAL OUTCOME IN PATIENTS WITH ROTATOR CUFF RELATED PATHOLOGIES



Abstract

Purpose: There is controversial information on recovery of patients with compensable injuries. The purpose of this matched case-control study was to examine the impact of an active compensation claim following a work-related shoulder injury on reporting disability as measured by subjective and objective outcomes at 1 year post-operatively.

Method: Data of 506 consecutive patients who had undergone a decompression or rotator cuff repair were reviewed. One hundred and fourteen patients were on compensation related to their shoulder problems. Patients were matched with a historical control group (patients without a compensation claim) based on age (4 age groups: < 40, 40–49, 50–59, 60–70), sex, and pathology (full-thickness tear vs. no tear). Outcome measures used were a disease-specific outcome, the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC) and two shoulder specific instruments, the American Shoulder and Elbow Score (ASES) and the Constant Murley (CM) score. Paired and independent t-tests and an analysis of covariance were performed.

Results: Data of the 214 patients (72 males and 35 females in each group) was used for analysis (mean age 48, SD: 10, range 20–69). Out of 107 patients in each group, 42 patients (58%) had undergone a full-thickness repair and 65 (61%) had surgeries related to impingement syndrome. Paired and independent t-tests showed that both groups improved significantly regardless of their claim status. However, the compensation group had a significantly lower level of improvement than the non-compensation group. An analysis of covariance which adjusted for pre-operative differences in disability scores showed that an active claim was indeed a strong predictor of follow up scores.

Conclusion: This is the first study that has used a matched case-control design to control for potential confounding factors in injured worker population. Our results indicate that although patients with work-related injuries demonstrate a lower level of recovery, they still benefit from surgery.

Correspondence should be addressed to CEO Doug C. Thomson. Email: doug@canorth.org