Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

HIP RESURFACING-RELATED PSEUDOTUMOURS ARE ASSOCIATED WITH INCREASED WEAR, CAUSED BY EDGE-LOADING AND IMPINGEMENT



Abstract

Introduction: Metal on metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty-induced pseudotumours are a serious complication, which occur in 4% of patients who undergo this procedure. The aim of this study was to measure the 3D in vivo wear on the surface of resurfacing components revised for pseudotumour, compared to a control group.

Method: Thirty-nine hip resurfacing implants were examined; these were sourced from our institutions prosthesis retrieval bank. They were divided into two groups; 22 patients with a clinical and histopathological diagnosis of pseudotumour and 17 controls. Patient demographics and time to revision were known. Three dimensional contactless metrology (Redlux™ Ltd) was used to scan the surface of the femoral and acetabular components, to a resolution of 20 nanometers. The location, depth and area of the wear scar was determined for each component. Volumetric wear was determined, along with the presence of absence of edge-loading. A separate blinded analysis to determine the presence of absence of impingement was performed by one of the authors. ANOVA was used to test for differences in wear and Fishers Exact test was used to compare the incidence of edge-loading between the groups.

Results: The volumetric wear rate for femoral component of the pseudotumour group was 4.7mm3/yr (SD3.5) and 1.7 mm3/yr (SD1.5) for the control group (p=0.03). In the pseudotumour group, the volumetric wear rate of the acetabular component was 3.5 mm3/yr (SD3.6) compared to 0.02 mm3/yr (SD0.07) for the control group (p=0.01). Edge-loading was detected in 74% of acetabular components in the pseudotumour group and 22% of those in the control group (p=0.01). Anterior or posterior edge-loading, consistent with impingement was present on the femoral components of 73% of patients in the pseudotumour group and 22% in the control group (p=0.01).

Discussion: This work demonstrates that implants revised for pseudotumour have significantly higher volumetric wear rates than controls. They also have a significantly higher incidence of edge-loading and impingement than controls. Edge-loading significantly increases wear. We suggest that pseudotumours are caused by high concentrations of metal wear debris, which have been shown to have a toxic effect on osteocytes and macrophages. This is the one of the first studies to demonstrate a clear link between pseudotumours and increased bearing surface wear. It is also the first to demonstrate that edge-loading, due to impingement, occurs in a significant number of patients who develop this condition. Improved implantation techniques and resurfacing designs may help avoid this serious complication of hip resurfacing.

Correspondence should be addressed to: EFORT Central Office, Technoparkstrasse 1, CH – 8005 Zürich, Switzerland. Tel: +41 44 448 44 00; Email: office@efort.org

Author: Sion Glyn-Jones, United Kingdom

E-mail: sion.glyn-jones@ndorms.ox.ac.uk