header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

CAN SUTURE PRE-TENSIONING REDUCE PLASTIC DEFORMATION?



Abstract

Introduction: The suture properties associated with a successful tendon repair are: high tensile strength, little tissue response, good handling characteristics and minimal plastic deformation. Plastic deformation contributes to gap formation at a tendon repair site. Gaps greater than 4mm are likely to fail. This study investigates whether the plastic deformation demonstrated by two commonly used suture materials can be reduced by manual pre-tensioning.

Methods: Twenty sutures of both Prolene 3/0 (Ethicon, UK) and Ethibond 3/0 (Excel, Johnson and Johnson, UK) were tested. Half of the sutures in each group were manually pre-tensioned prior to knot tying and half were knotted without pre-tensioning. All knots were standard surgical knots with six throws. The suture lengths were measured before and after a standardised cyclical loading regime on an Instron tensile tester. The regime was designed to represent the finger flexion forces produced in a typical rehabilitation programme. All sutures were subsequently tested to their ultimate tensile strength.

Results: After cyclical loading the pre-tensioned sutures demonstrated a mean increase in suture length of 0.7% (range 0.1–1.9%). The sutures not pre-tensioned showed a mean increase of 5.4% (range 3.3–7%). This equates to 87% less plastic deformation (p < 0.05 Students’ T-test) upon pre-tensioning. There were no differences with Ethibond. Pre-tensioning had no effect on ultimate tensile strength for either group.

Conclusions: Manual pre-tensioning reduces plastic deformation in Prolene 3/0 sutures without affecting the ultimate tensile strength. This simple technique could theoretically diminish gap formation at the site of a tendon repair.

Correspondence should be addressed to: EFORT Central Office, Technoparkstrasse 1, CH – 8005 Zürich, Switzerland. Tel: +41 44 448 44 00; Email: office@efort.org

Author: George Smith, United Kingdom

E-mail: ghxsmith@googlemail.com