header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

INFLUENCE OF BMI ON FEMORAL OSTEOLYSIS FIVE TO TEN YEARS AFTER TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY



Abstract

Background: Among patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) 24–36% are obese. The most important long-term complication is periprosthetic osteolysis. While patient activity, implant type and quality of fixation are known risk factors for osteolysis, the literature concerning obesity is sparse and controversial. Our objective was to evaluate the influence of obesity on femoral osteolysis five and ten years after primary THA with a cemented stem.

Methods: Prospective cohort study conducted between 1996 and 2003 among patients undergoing THA (uncemented cup, cemented stem, 28mm head and ceramic-polyethylene bearing surface) inserted with a third generation cementing technique. All patients were seen at either five or ten years, with information regarding BMI and activity, and with radiographic follow-up. BMI was evaluated in three and four categories (< 25, 25–29.9 (reference category), 30–34.9 and ≥35 kg/m2). Activity was assessed using the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) activity scale (1–10 points). Main outcome was the radiographic assessment of femoral osteolysis. Secondary outcomes were polyethylene wear and revision for aseptic loosening.

Results: We included 503 THAs in 433 patients. Of those 241 THAs (48%) were seen at five years and 262 (52%) at ten years. Osteolytic lesions were identified in forty-four cases, twenty-four in 181 normal weight patients (13.3%), eleven in 205 overweight (5.4%), seven in ninety-six obese class I (7.3%), and two in twenty-one obese class II patients (9.5%). Activity was highest in normal weight patients (mean UCLA score 5.5, ±2.0) and lowest in patients obese class II (mean UCLA score 4.8, ±1.7). Univariate as well as multivariate logistic regression analysis adjusting for activity, cementing quality, age, and sex did not show an increased risk of osteolysis in obese compared to overweight patients (adjusted OR 1.4, 95% CI 0.6; 3.7). A significantly higher risk was found in normal weight patients (adjusted OR 2.6, 95% CI 1.2; 5.7). Total mean polyethylene wear was significantly lower in obese compared to normal/overweight patients (p=0.024). Revision for aseptic loosening of the stem was necessary in 4 patients (3 normal weight patients and 1 overweight patient).

Conclusions: We did not find an increased risk for femoral osteolysis or revision for aseptic loosening in obese patients five and ten years after primary THA with a cemented stem.

Correspondence should be addressed to: EFORT Central Office, Technoparkstrasse 1, CH – 8005 Zürich, Switzerland. Tel: +41 44 448 44 00; Email: office@efort.org

Author: Anne Lübbeke, Switzerland

E-mail: anne.lubbekewolff@hcuge.ch