INVERTED TOTAL SHOULDER PROSTHESIS DELTA IN THE TREATMENT OF GLENOHUMERAL OSTEOARTHRITIS WITH MASSIVE ROTATOR CUFF TEARS: AN ANALYSIS OF 68 SHOULDERS WITH A MEAN FOLLOW-UP OF 42 MONTHS

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was a clinical and radiological evaluation of 68 shoulders operated with the Delta reverse-ball-and-socket total shoulder prosthesis by the senior author with a mean follow-up of 42 months.

Methods: This is a retrospective study in one consecutive series of 68 shoulders, operated by the senior author, which were clinically assessed using the Constant score for pain, Constant Shoulder Score, Oxford Shoulder Score, UCLA Shoulder rating scale, DASH Score, Rowe Score for Instability and Oxford Instability Score. Radiological evaluation was graded by the classification according to Nerot et al. and complications were analysed according to Goslings and Gouma. Patients were evaluated before surgery and at a mean clinical follow-up of 42 months.

Results: There was a significant improvement in all clinical and stability scores. On the average, the Constant score for pain increased from 4.62 to 11.08 points (p< 0.05); the Constant Shoulder Score from 32.65 to 60.31 (p> 0.05); the Oxford Shoulder Score increased from 32.65 to 60.31 (p< 0.05) and the UCLA Shoulder rating scale increased from 15.08 to 27.42 (p< 0.05). The evaluation of stability showed an increase from 49.42 to 80.19 points in the Rowe Score for Instability and from 22.04 to 37.62 in the Oxford Instability score (p< 0.05). According to the Nerot classification, 65 percent of patients were graded as “0”, 20 percent as “1”, 3 percent as “2”, 6 percent as “3” and 6 percent as “4”. Eight complications occurred in terms of a nerve lesion which was graded according to Goslings and Gouma as “1” once, loosening of the humeral stem which was graded as “2” three times and loosening or fracture of the glenoid component which was graded as “2” in five times. At mean follow-up of 42 months, one patient of this series had died of decrepitude which was graded as “4” and one patient was lost of follow-up.

Conclusions: We summarize, that there were significant advantages identified in terms of the Constant score for pain, all clinical scores and the instability scores. Radiological analyses showed 85 percent of patients without or with a small notch only. On the other hand, the rate of complications should be taken into account. We conclude that shoulder arthroplasty with the Delta prosthesis shows significant benefits in terms of less shoulder pain, a higher stability and a gain of range of motion but on the other hand, we emphasize that this treatment remains a salvage procedure in the elderly only.