COMPARISON OF CROSS SECTIONS OF THE FEMORAL COMPONENT OF DIFFERENT BICONDYLAR KNEE ENDOPROSTHESES WITH REGARD TO REVISION ARTHROPLASTY

Abstract

Introduction: Total knee replacement has become a common procedure with good clinical results. Today many different designs of the femoral component of bicondylar endoprostheses are offered by industry. The femoral components show similar designs however different angles and length of the cross sections are specific. Because of these design differences the preoperative planning and sparing bone resection are difficult at the revision surgery. The aim of this experimental study was to compare the design of femoral components at their cross section contours to find congruence and differences of common bicondylar endoprostheses to prove the possibility of design exchange during revision surgery.

Material and method: Ten femoral components (e.motion^®, Genesis II, Genia^®, Innex^®, LCS^®, Multigen Plus, NexGen^®, P.F.C.^®, Scorpio^®, Vanguard^®) of similar implant size were analysed with regard to their cross section design. Therefore the constructional properties of the inner surface (direction and length of cross sections) of the components were determined. The components were scanned with a three-dimensional laser scanner and were transferred to two dimensional CAD models to the lateral and frontal view in order to compare the inner contours. The contours of the cross sections were overlaid with congruence of the posterior and anterior cross section of all components at lateral view.

Results: Four of the ten analysed femoral components showed good congruence of the cross sections. Here, only a few additional bone resections or extra bone cement have to be done at the diagonal cross sections to change the femoral design among each other. Four other components show wide differences between the inner contours in comparison to the first four components especially at their posterior and diagonal cross sections. Two components can not be compared with the others due to their diagonal distal cross section.

Discussion: The numerical results shows good congruence of cross section contours of some analysed femoral components. Furthermore there were clear design differences which complicate the exchange of the femoral component at revision surgery. The use of an elementary inner contour of femoral components of bicondylar endoprostheses could be an advantage for revision arthroplasty in regard to bone sparing surgical treatment.