FEMORAL NECK FRACTURE FOLLOWING HIP RESURFACING: IS NOTCHING A LIKELY CAUSE?

Abstract

Introduction: A unique failure mode of hip resurfacing is femoral neck fracture. These tend to occur early after surgery during normal activities. One theory regarding fracture occurrence includes the introduction of stress magnifiers in the form of notches on the superior neck. The presence of a notch can arise from reaming or from removal of osteophytes during surgery. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of notching the femoral neck, following resurfacing by using a finite element (FE) model.

Methods: A physiological load case was simulated in the FE model of a femur, implanted with a cemented hip resurfacing system. Twelve implant alignments were modelled: an ideal implant alignment with no notch, and a 1 mm, 3 mm, 5 mm and 7 mm superior notch; 5° anteversion, 5° and 10° degrees retroversion; 5° and 10° degrees in varus and valgus. These models were compared to that of an intact femur for baseline analysis.

The intact femur geometry was derived from a CT dataset of a cadaveric femur and CT numbers were converted into a realistic distribution of material properties. The FE intact mesh was based on an experimentally validated mesh of a human femur. The femur was segmented into 22 neck sections.

The loading condition was modelled to represent an instant at 10% of gait where all muscle forces were included. The femoral neck regions were compared between the models to evaluate the effect of notch sizes on stress distribution. Maximum tensile stresses were compared to the ultimate tensile stress (UTS) of cortical and cancellous bone.

Results: As the notch size increased the peak and average 1st (tensile) and 3rd (compressive) principal stress increased along the superior portion of the femoral neck. For the 5 mm superior notch, the maximum 1st principal stress increased by 283% and 154% when compared to that of the ideally aligned implant and the intact femur respectively. The largest increase of tensile stress was observed when the implant was mal-aligned in 10° of varus; this resulted in a 768% increase in stress compared to the ideally implanted model.

Discussion: The introduction of a superior notch causes a stress concentration on the femoral neck. Although the stress concentration is pronounced, a notch on the superior aspect of the femoral neck may not lead to fracture following resurfacing; the UTS of cortical bone is 100MPa, and the UTS of cancellous bone is between 2MPa and 20MPa. Peak stresses in the model are well below the UTS of cortical bone, and for damage to accumulate in cancellous bone, energy absorption in the ‘honey-comb’ structure of trabecular bone must be considered. Varus mal-alignment resulted in the largest increase in tensile stress on the superior aspect of the neck, and has been associated with femoral neck fracture; this type of mal-alignment may be critical when considering femoral neck fractures.