header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

SYSTEMIC MESENCHYMAL STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION FOR THE TREATMENT OF SKELETAL MUSCLE TRAUMA



Abstract

Objectives: Skeletal muscle trauma leads to severe functional deficits. Present therapeutic treatments are unsatisfying and insufficient posttraumatic regeneration is a problem in trauma and orthopaedic surgery. Mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) therapy is a promising tool in the regeneration of muscle function after severe trauma. Our group showed increased contraction forces compared to a non-treated control group 3 weeks after MSC transplantation (TX) into a skeletal muscle trauma. In addition we demonstrated a dose-response relationship of the amount of MSC and force enhancement. We furthermore investigated the fate of the transplanted MSC labelled with very small iron oxide particles using 7 Tesla-MRI. Histological analysis revealed fusion events between existing myofibers but only to a low amount. The increase of muscle force can not be explained by these events only. Before further steps are taken the impact of paracrine effects and the homing to the site of trauma of the MSC has to be evaluated. Experimental studies about the functional regeneration of traumatized skeletal muscule after systemic MSC-TX do not exist.

Methods: 36 female SD-rats received open crush trauma of the left soleus muscle. One week after trauma 2.5 x 106 autologous MSC, harvested from tibial biopsies, were transplanted intraarterially (i.a., femoral arte-ria, group 1) or intravenously (i.v., tail vein, group 2) (n=18). Control animals received saline (i.a.: group 3; i.v.: group 4) (n=18). Histological analysis and biomechanical evaluation by in vivo muscle force measurement was performed 3 weeks after TX.

Results: Twitch stimulation of the healthy right soleus muscles resulted in a contraction force of 0.52±0.14 N. Forces of tetanic contraction in the uninjured muscles reached 0.98±0.27 N. The i.a. MSC-TX improved the muscle force of the injured soleus significantly compared to control (twitch: 82,4%, p=0.02, tetany: 61.6%, p=0.02). Contraction forces of muscles treated i.v. (MSC vs. saline) showed no significant difference. The histological analysis showed no differences in the amount of fibrotic tissue.

Conclusions: The presented study demonstrates the effect of systemic MSC-TX in the treatment of severe skeletal muscle injuries. Interestingly, the functional regeneration could only be increased by i.a. application. The entrapment of MSC in the lungs and the dilution effect in the circulation, when injecting the MSC i.v. could be the reason. For possible future therapeutic approaches a systemic application is considered to be favourable compared to local injections due to the better distribution of the cells in the target muscle.

Correspondence should be addressed to: EFORT Central Office, Technoparkstrasse 1, CH – 8005 Zürich, Switzerland. Tel: +41 44 448 44 00; Email: office@efort.org

Author: Philipp Von Roth, Germany

E-mail: philipp.roth@charite.de