SPINAL TUMOR RESECTION AND SPINE RECONSTRUCTION: RATIONALE AND RESULTS

Abstract

Purpose: To present a series of 49 patients which underwent single or two staged complete spondylectomy, vertebral body reconstruction and segmental spinal stabilization due to spinal tumors.

Materials and Methods: From 1992 to 2002, 49 patients with primary or metastatic spinal tumors were treated. There were 36 females and 13 males with mean age at operation of 53.5 years (19 – 80). The preoperative classification was Frankel E in 17 cases, B – D in 31 cases and A in one case. Five patients had nerve root dysfunction and one, classified as Frankel E, had sphincter inadequacy. The parts of the spine involved were lower cervical in 7 cases, thoracic in 10, thoracolumbar in 15 and lumbar in 17 cases. The operations were two staged in 36 cases and single staged in 13 cases. In the cervical spine, titanium cylinders filled with methylmethacrylate were used. For the rest of the spine, the most commonly used instruments were the Kaneda device, followed by the Miami–MOSS system. Bone graft was used in five benign tumors. Mean follow – up was 62.3 months.

Results: One patient died during the anterior procedure and in another it had to be interrupted, whereupon he died one week later. Two patients died due to their underlying pathology in the 6th post–operative month. Complications included wound healing problems in 9 patients and local recurrence in one patient. There were no neurological deteriorations or instrument failures. The majority of patients experienced improvement in their neurological status, reduction of pain or both. Most patients were functionally improved and spinal alignment was maintained in all.

Conclusion: Spinal tumor resection and spinal reconstruction provide stability, early weight bearing, symptom remission and neurological improvement.