NOVEL CERAMIC-ON-METAL HIP REPLACEMENTS

Abstract

Ceramic-on-metal (ceramic head and metal liner, COM) hip replacements have shown reduced wear in comparison to metal-on-metal (MOM) bearings (Firkins et al., 1999). This has been attributed to a reduction in corrosive wear, differential hardness and a reduction in adhesive wear. In a clinical report on the use of a metal-on-ceramic hip replacement (Valenti et al., 2007) which consisted of a stainless steel head and alumina ceramic insert at revision 6-months post-op massive metallosis and macroscopic wear was observed.

The aim of this study was to assess the performance of ceramic and metal bearings in different configurations under adverse conditions, ceramic heads on metal liners (COM) were compared to metal heads on ceramic inserts (MOC), with head on cup rim loading under micro-separation hip joint simulation.

Components used were made of zirconia-platelet toughened alumina (Biolox Delta) and high carbon (0.2wt%) CoCrMo alloy (DePuy International Ltd, UK). Hip simulator testing applied a twin-peak loading cycle and walking motions with the prosthesis in the anatomical position. The lubricant (25% calf-serum) was changed every 0.33Mc, wear was measured gravimetrically. Testing was conducted for 2-million cycles, a standard simulator cycle was adapted so the head subluxed in the swing phase forcing the head onto the cup rim at heel strike (Williams et al., 2006).

The total overall mean wear rate for the MOC bearings (0.71±0.30mm3/Mc) was significantly higher than the wear rate for the COM bearings (0.09±0.025mm3/Mc). The contact of the head against the rim of the cup at heel strike caused deep stripe wear on the metallic heads of the MOC bearings. This region on the head is exposed to high stress conditions and susceptible to damage in edge contact, the effect of this is increased when the cup is a harder material than the head. The wear of a metal-on-metal (MOM) couple under similar conditions was almost two-fold greater than the MOC couple (1.58mm3/Mc, Williams et al., 2006) providing further evidence of the reduced wear with COM in comparison to MOM.

The explant described Valenti et al. included a stainless steel head, this is a softer material compared to CoCr, and wears at a higher level. It can be postulated that the wear under adverse conditions would be further increased.

The COM concept can provide increased design flexibility; thin metal shells can be used with larger ceramic heads. Additionally the design protects against ceramic liner chipping. COM bearings are currently undergoing clinical trials, early data suggests reduced metal ion release in patients with COM bearings compared to metal-on-metal (Williams et al., 2007).