DISTALLY LOCKED STEMS FOR REVISION HIP ARTHROPLASTIES WITH SEVERE FEMORAL BONE LOSS. RESULTS OF 101 CASES AFTER A MEAN FOLLOW-UP OF SIX YEARS (5–12)

Abstract

Introduction: Cementless revision hip arthroplasties require a stable initial fixation that does not compromise a subsequent bone reconstruction. In case of severe femoral bone loss, stems usually requires distal fixation that may induce stress shielding and finally reduce the spontaneous bone reconstruction. We introduced the use of distally locked revision stems in 1993 hoping strong fixation and bone reconstruction. The goal of the current study was to assess if these components fulfill these two objectives.

Materials and Methods: 101 cementless femoral revision stems with distal locking by screws (Ultime™ Wright-Cremascoli) were inserted from 1993 to 2001. These stems were smooth distally and porous coated with or without HA 1/3 proximally. The indication to use these components was severe bone loss (Paprosky grade IIC and III in 51%) when press fit distal fixation could not be obtained. The use of bone graft was limited to segmental defects or to treat trochanteric non-union. An extended trochanteric osteotomy was performed in 89%. The revision was performed because of aseptic loosening in 43,4%, periprosthetic fracture in 24,2% and infected loosening in 25,2%. The results were assessed after a mean follow-up of 6 years (5–12).

Results: 13 patients deceased and 2 were lost for follow-up. All the extended trochanteric osteotomies healed. Merle d’Aubigné hip score increased from 8.3 to 13.4, but thigh pain was observed in 44%. Bone reconstruction was significant according to Hoffman index at 3 levels of assessment. The 5-year survivorship was 87% considering aseptic revision for any reason. Seventeen repeated femoral procedures were performed: 9 related to thigh pain (because there was no proximal osteointegration) that were revised for short primary stems, 8 because of stem fractures (all occurred at the level of the proximal hole with the same stem size because there was no proximal fixation as long as the stems were smooth or without HA-coating.

Discussion: This serie has the longest follow-up using locked revision stems. Despite severe pre-operative bone loss, primary fixation and significant bone reconstruction were obtained for all the cases without extensive bone grafting. The major weakness, thigh pain and stem break, were related to unadequate femoral coating for these cementless stems that did not achieved osteointegration. Conversly, the reoperations were simple, allowing the use of short primary designs as bone reconstruction was achieved in all cases without extensive bone grafting. These locked stems allow a strong primary distal fixation that does not compromise bone regeneration. An improvement of femoral coating (extension to 2/3 and use of hydroxyapatite) may reduce the rate of thigh pain and reoperation.