Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

LONG-TERM MIGRATION USING EBRAFCA OF STEMS CEMENTED LINE-TO-LINE ACCORDING TO THE ‘FRENCH PARADOX’ PRINCIPLES



Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this study was to evaluate the in vivo migration patterns using EBRA-FCA of a consecutive series of polished femoral components cemented line-toline.

Materials and Methods: Between January 1988 and December 1989, 164 primary total hip arthroplasties were performed in 155 patients. The mean age at the time of the index arthroplasty was 63.8 ± 11.6 years. A single design prosthesis was used combining an all-polyethylene socket and a 22.2 mm femoral head. The mono-block double tapered (5.2°) femoral component made of 316-L stainless steel had a highly polished surface (Ra = 0.04 μm) and a quadrangular section(Kerboull® MKIII, Stryker). The femoral preparation included removal of diaphyseal cancellous bone to obtain primary rotational stability of the stem prior to the line-to-line cementation. For each patients, all available AP radiographs of the pelvis were digitized (Vidar Sierra Plus, Vidar System Corporation, Herdon, Virginia) and linked to an IMB-compatible computer. The EBRAFCA software is a validated method designed to assess migration of a femoral component through comparable pairs of radiographs.

Results: At the minimum 15-year follow-up, 73 patients (77 hips) were still alive and had not been revised at a mean of 17.3 ± 0.8 years (15–18 years), 8 patients (8 hips) had been revised for high polyethylene wear associated with periacetabular osteolysis, 66 patients (69 hips) were deceased, and 8 patients (10 hips) were lost to follow-up. Among the 8 revision procedures, the femoral component was loose in 3 hips. A total of 1689 radiographs (mean 10.3 per hip) were digitized. At the last follow-up, the mean subsidence of the entire series was 0.63 ± 0.49 mm (median of 0.61 mm; range 0 to 1.94 mm). When using a 1.5 mm threshold (accuracy of the EBRAFCA method) for subsidence, 4 of the 142 stems with adequate EBRA-FCA data were considered to have migrated. Using a threshold of 2 mm for subsidence, none of the 142 stems were considered to have migrated. The patterns of migration were calculated every 2 years giving 9 intervals. The evolution of mean subsidence during the whole follow-up period remained below 1.5 mm.

Discussion: Mean subsidence of this quadrangular highly polished femoral component remained below the accuracy of the method (± 1.5 mm) throughout the entire follow-up period. Of the 142 hips analyzed, only four (2.8%) had subsided of more than 1.5 mm and none more than 2 mm. This study demonstrates that contrary to other cemented femoral components that have provided excellent survival in the long term frequently associated with stem subsidence, a highly polished cemented double tapered femoral component with a quadrangular cross-section cemented line to line does not subside up to 18-year follow-up.

Correspondence should be addressed to: EFORT Central Office, Technoparkstrasse 1, CH – 8005 Zürich, Switzerland. Email: office@efort.org