GENDER-SPECIFIC ACETABULAR SURGERY BASED UPON A SCALED PELVIC FRAME OF REFERENCE

Abstract

Acetabular centre positioning in the pelvis has a profound effect on hip joint function. The force–and moment-generating capacities of the hip muscles are highly sensitive to the location of the hip centre. We describe a novel 3D CT-based system that provides a scaled frame of reference (FOR) defining the hip centre coordinates in relation to easily identifiable pelvic anatomic landmarks. This FOR is more specific than the anterior pelvic plane (APP) alone, giving depth, height and width to the pelvis for both men and women under-going hip surgery.

CT scans of 22 normal hips were analysed. There were 14 female and 8 male hips. The APP was used as the basis of the coordinate system with the origin set at the right anterior superior iliac spine. After aligning the pelvis with the APP, the pelvic horizontal dimension (Dx) was defined as the distance between the most lateral points on the iliac crests, and its vertical dimension (Dy) was the distance between the highest point on the iliac wing and the lowest point on ischial tuberosity. The pelvic depth (Dz) was defined as the horizontal distance between the posterior superior iliac spine and the ipsilateral ASIS. The ratios of the hip centre’s x, y, and z coordinates to their corresponding pelvic dimensions (Cx/Dx, Cy/Dy, Cz,Dz) were calculated. The results were analysed for men and women.

For a given individual the hip centre coordinates can be derived from pelvic landmarks. We have found that the mean Cx/Dx measured 0.09 ± 0.02 (0.10 for males, 0.08 for females), Cy/Dy was 0.33 ± 0.02 (0.30 for males, 0.35 for females), and Cz/Dz was 0.37 ± 0.02 (0.39 for males and 0.36 for females). There was a statistically significant gender difference in Cy/Dy (p=0.0001) and Cz/Dz (p=0.03), but not in Cx/Dx (p=0.17). Anteversion for the male hips averaged 19° ± 3°, and for the female hips it was 26° ± 5°. Inclination measured 56° ± 1° for the males and 55° ± 4° for the females. Reliability testing showed a mean intra-class correlation coefficient of 0.95. Bland-Altman plots showed a good inter-observer agreement.

This method relies on a small number of anatomical points that are easily identifiable. The fairly constant relationship between the centre coordinates and pelvic dimensions allows derivation of the hip centre position from those dimensions. Even in this small group, it is apparent that there is a difference between the sexes in all three dimensions. Without the need for detailed imaging, the pelvic points allow the surgeon to scale the patient’s pelvis and thereby know within a few millimetres the ‘normal’ position of the acetabulum for both men and women. This knowledge may be of benefit when planning or undertaking reconstructive hip surgery especially in patients with hip dysplasia or bilateral hip disease where there is no reference available for planning the surgery.