RIVAROXABAN FOR PREVENTION OF VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM AFTER TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENT: IMPACT ON HEALTHCARE COSTS BASED ON THE RECORD1 STUDY

Abstract

Rivaroxaban is a novel, oral, once-daily, direct Factor Xa inhibitor in advanced development for the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE). This study analysed the potential economic benefit attributable to the use of oral rivaroxaban relative to subcutaneous enoxaparin for extended VTE prophylaxis (35±4 days) after total hip replacement (THR). In RECORD1, rivaroxaban reduced the incidence of the composite primary efficacy endpoint (total VTE, including all-cause mortality) by 70%, compared with enoxaparin (p< 0.001). Symptomatic VTE occurred in 0.3% and 0.5% (p=0.22) of patients receiving rivaroxaban and enoxaparin, respectively. Major bleeding was low and similar in both groups: 0.3% and 0.1% (p=0.18), respectively.

Potential savings associated with oral rivaroxaban were based on any reduction in the incidence of symptomatic VTE events, and reduced administration and monitoring costs. Analyses for both the US and the UK included only non-drug costs incurred by the healthcare sector. It was assumed that nurses spent 3 minutes/day administering enoxaparin and training patients to self-inject; assumed duration of hospital stay was 5 days. UK costs (based on the 2007 NICE Guidelines) also included full blood counts (FBCs) every 3 days, for up to 14 days, in patients receiving enoxaparin.

Two analyses were performed: one assumed no difference in the occurrence of symptomatic VTE between treatments; the other assumed that the observed difference was real, but did not reach statistical significance.

In the first analysis, assuming no difference in symptomatic VTE incidence, the total resource cost in the US was $46/patient for enoxaparin and $42.5/patient for rivaroxaban: a saving of $3.5/patient. For the UK, the total resource cost was £33/patient for enoxaparin and £7.5/per patient for rivaroxaban: a saving of £25.5/ patient. Savings were driven by reduced monitoring (FBCs) and administration costs.

In the second analysis, assuming the observed difference in symptomatic VTE incidence was real, the US total resource cost was $57/patient for enoxaparin and $42.5/patient for rivaroxaban: a saving of $14.5/patient. For the UK, the total resource cost was £30/patients for enoxaparin and £7.5/patient for rivaroxaban: a saving of £22.5/patient. Savings were again driven by reduced monitoring and administration costs, and also reduced VTE incidence.

Over 400,000 US patients undergo THR, and ~60,000 patients in England and Wales undergo THR annually. Thus, the potential cumulative cost savings with rivaroxaban are considerable.